<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You Ready for a New Page Ranking System?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization and Social Media Experts Tell All, Including Linkbait Creation and the Dark Side of Cloaking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:09:28 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: amit</title>
		<link>http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-17172</link>
		<dc:creator>amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/#comment-17172</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;page ranking system is not a tough job to be done ...neither the coding nor the designing...  changing system might change the entire scnario of google and page displayed will be obviously different&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>page ranking system is not a tough job to be done &#8230;neither the coding nor the designing&#8230;  changing system might change the entire scnario of google and page displayed will be obviously different</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lew</title>
		<link>http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-14434</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/#comment-14434</guid>
		<description>If they change their page rank system they will have to get a totally new patent for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they change their page rank system they will have to get a totally new patent for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOProWebsites.com</title>
		<link>http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-12498</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOProWebsites.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/#comment-12498</guid>
		<description>One of my real estate sites that has been online over 6 years with about 50 pr4 pages just got dropped to 0&#039;s and the home page down to a pr2.
I have a solution that is planned to be used at public10.com sometime soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my real estate sites that has been online over 6 years with about 50 pr4 pages just got dropped to 0&#8217;s and the home page down to a pr2.<br />
I have a solution that is planned to be used at public10.com sometime soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology Transfer</title>
		<link>http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-11318</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology Transfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/#comment-11318</guid>
		<description>As a programmer I can tell you that building a website with a different ranking system can be difficult depending on the ranking criteria. Think about it - it ie easy to rank a site based on link numbers or visitors numbers (and by the way, i know persons that have created programs that simulate site visits from different IPs .. milions of visits/day). but if you change to criteria like posts complexity or content ... things change. And don&#039;t forget the flash sites, that have no html content visible ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a programmer I can tell you that building a website with a different ranking system can be difficult depending on the ranking criteria. Think about it &#8211; it ie easy to rank a site based on link numbers or visitors numbers (and by the way, i know persons that have created programs that simulate site visits from different IPs .. milions of visits/day). but if you change to criteria like posts complexity or content &#8230; things change. And don&#8217;t forget the flash sites, that have no html content visible ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1838</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/#comment-1838</guid>
		<description>Building web applications is indeed a simple job, provided we know what kind of algorithm and techniques that can really judge a website fairly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Building web applications is indeed a simple job, provided we know what kind of algorithm and techniques that can really judge a website fairly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Interesting this could make for a cool blog plugin project.

I&#039;d like to see something proportionate,something that didnt rank a site or a blog based on link numbers or visitor numbers.Perhaps a thing that counted visitor interactions, bounce rates, form submissions, session lengths, repeat visitors,comment to post ratios,comment length,post length,post frequencies.

Then you&#039;d need a server and a trusted source to house the data and send back the signals and as you point out the trust of the community too.We all know too well how easily the trust in a thing can be lost. Googles altavistic suicide tendencies are a testament to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting this could make for a cool blog plugin project.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see something proportionate,something that didnt rank a site or a blog based on link numbers or visitor numbers.Perhaps a thing that counted visitor interactions, bounce rates, form submissions, session lengths, repeat visitors,comment to post ratios,comment length,post length,post frequencies.</p>
<p>Then you&#8217;d need a server and a trusted source to house the data and send back the signals and as you point out the trust of the community too.We all know too well how easily the trust in a thing can be lost. Googles altavistic suicide tendencies are a testament to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elliotp</title>
		<link>http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>elliotp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/#comment-469</guid>
		<description>umm.. stumbled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm.. stumbled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Casino Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Casino Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Another problem is who&#039;s going to accept the new ranking system. It likely has to come from a trusted source. Yahoo? MSN? And then we may run into the same problems we currently have with Google. The advantage is then that Google has a competitor. Competition may breed different policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another problem is who&#8217;s going to accept the new ranking system. It likely has to come from a trusted source. Yahoo? MSN? And then we may run into the same problems we currently have with Google. The advantage is then that Google has a competitor. Competition may breed different policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis Sellers</title>
		<link>http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Sellers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alistseo.com/53/new-page-ranking-system/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Coding it is not really the hard part. A competent programmer or two could make a working PHP prototype of such a thing in a relatively short amount of the time.

The issue is: What algorithms and weights etc should be used? This is really a question that a group of SEO pros need to get together about, hash around a bit, and write a few pages of simple English with scatterings of algebra, etc to describe.

Once that&#039;s settled, you can pretty much just hand it off to some good programmers to have the thing built. (Not to say that a few geeky-types shouldn&#039;t be consulted about the new alg while writing it up to avoid some technical pitfalls.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coding it is not really the hard part. A competent programmer or two could make a working PHP prototype of such a thing in a relatively short amount of the time.</p>
<p>The issue is: What algorithms and weights etc should be used? This is really a question that a group of SEO pros need to get together about, hash around a bit, and write a few pages of simple English with scatterings of algebra, etc to describe.</p>
<p>Once that&#8217;s settled, you can pretty much just hand it off to some good programmers to have the thing built. (Not to say that a few geeky-types shouldn&#8217;t be consulted about the new alg while writing it up to avoid some technical pitfalls.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
